Argument - based Validation for the Korean Speaking Test for Academic Purposes — Examining the Extrapolation Inference
Lee Sunjun Hong Eunsil Oh Yelim Lee Seungwon Cho Sujin Min Byeonggon
Sungkyunkwan University, Department of Korean as a Foreign Language Education, Lecturer Sungkyunkwan University, Professor Seoul National University, Department of Korean Language Education, Ph.D. Student Seoul National University, Department of Korean Language Education, Ph.D. Student Sogang University, Korean as a Foreign Language Education, Full-time Lecturer Seoul National University, Department of Korean Language Education, Professor / Institute of Korean Language Education Research, Researcher
Korean Language Education Research Vol. 56 No. 1 pp.231-264 (2021)
Abstract
Lee Sunjun · Hong Eunsil · Oh Yelim · Lee Seungwon · Cho Sujin · Min Byeonggon This article investigates the extrapolation inference for the Korean Speaking Test for Academic Purposes(KoSTAP) in relation to providing information on the performance of international students in academic speaking tasks in practical contexts. The Argument schemes of extrapolation inference and validation study were designed based on the argument-based approach. Evidence of extrapolation inference was collected by comparing the KoSTAP scores with learners’ performance in the real-world target domain. International students who participated in this study, listened to a lecture in a simulated class and performed related speaking tasks. The extrapolation inference was verified by analyzing the correlation between the result of the speaking task evaluation and the KoSTAP score. This study shows that KoSTAP functions as a tool to evaluate the practical academic speaking skills required by universities in relation to the lecture context. It also presents the future usefulness of KoSTAP.
Keywords
Speaking Test for Academic PurposesValidityArgument-based ValidationExtrapolation InferenceExperimental Research
