It's a trend to regard reading as social practice actions lately. But we haven't stated ‘The reading of social practice actions’ yet concretely. This paper set the goal at studying of the concrete phase. Considering the character of the reading of social practice actions specially, this paper focused on searching the appropriate reading methods. This paper doesn't try to studying the goal comprehensively, but the one of trial to reach the goal. In order to design the method of reading, first, the theory of language and the theory of culture need to be integrated which doesn't purse simple mix and integration in stages. Second, it is to be chosen to guarantee the flexibility of the text which is based on not the fixed entity but the flexible entity of the text. This paper talked on the concrete method based on the Fairclough (1992) who suggest's analysis of discourse with treating of the three aspect such as text, discourse practice and social practice. The analysis of the text means the analysis of linguistic aspect such as vocabulary, grammar, cohesion, textual structure. The analysis of the discourse practice means the production, distribution, consumption of the text, and means the analysis of the force of utterance, coherence, intertextuality concretely. The analysis of the social practice means that how the discursive event exchange's with social institution and environment, and build's up the entity of discourse practice with constructive effect. Text, dicourse practice and social practice don't exist in stages. It would be better stop analyzing social practice based on the analysis of the discourse practice after analysis of the text. It doesn't means that the relations among text, dicourse practice and social practice aren't in stages because the sphere of social practice include the sphere of dicourse practice which include the sphere of text. For example, the analysis of the text can be made simultaneously with the analysis of the discourse practice and social practice. It is meaningless trial to read text with dividing strictly among the sphere of text, dicourse practice and social practice. When text, dicourse practice and social practice are arranged in a straight line, the effect of the language theory is big with an inclination to the sphere of the text, the effect of the culture theory is big with an inclination to the sphere of the social practice. But as it is meaningless trial to divide strictly among the sphere of text, dicourse practice and social practice, it is also meaningless trial to divide the applied scope of the sphere of the theory. It haven't been clear to answer to a question such as what is the reading as a social practice, what is the concrete method. This paper just emphasizes again the necessity of discussion, it is necessary to be discussed profoundly what the reading as a social practice is and what the concrete method is.